Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

[DOWNLOAD] "Dept of Health v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings" by State of Florida In the District Court of Appeal First District # Book PDF Kindle ePub Free

Dept of Health v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Dept of Health v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings
  • Author : State of Florida In the District Court of Appeal First District
  • Release Date : January 15, 2006
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 73 KB

Description

Upon consideration of the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, the court has concluded that appellants have no standing. Appellants have sought review of a wholly favorable order adopting the argument presented by appellants in the trial court and denying appellees motion for return of documents. An appeal of a wholly favorable judgment must be dismissed. See Fla. Commn on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology v. State, Dept of Ins. & Treasurer, 716 So. 2d 345, 346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)(dismissing petition for writ of certiorari in administrative law case, the outcome of which was favorable to appellant); Gen. Dev. Utils., Inc. v. Fla. Pub. Serv. Commn, Div. of Admin. Hearings, 385 So. 2d 1050, 1051 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)(dismissing appeal based on long- standing rule that judgment or decree wholly in favor of a party may not be appealed by that party). See also N. Shore Bank v. Town of Surfside, 72 So. 2d 659, 661 (Fla. 1954)(dismissing appeal of wholly favorable final decree, which held public improvement certificates, owned by appellants, to be legal and valid obligations of town); Credit Indus. Co. v. Remark Chem. Co., 67 So. 2d 540, 541 (Fla. 1953)(dismissing appeal of wholly favorable final order granting appellants motion for summary decree); Lovett v. Lovett, 112 So. 768, 782 (Fla. 1927)("[I]rregularities in chancery practice committed at the defendants instance and by his consent, are not available to reverse a final decree entered against him."); Witt v. Baars, 18 So. 330, 330 (Fla. 1895)("The bill having been dismissed as to the appellant Mary Witt, no relief whatever having been granted against her, or any liability adjudged against her or her estate, she cannot appeal; and the appeal as to her should be dismissed . . . .").


PDF Ebook Download "Dept of Health v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings" Online ePub Kindle